135
By Anonymous - / Wednesday 12 January 2011 08:23 / Canada
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments

Well, the man has a point, unless it would definitely be your own money you would spend on clothes. Besides, why would you need to go on a shopping spree? Surely you'd have a selection of clothes from before you were pregnant that would fit when you lose the baby weight, and you could buy a couple of new things as a reward for being able to lose the weight. Unless you used the word spree as an exaggeration.

Comments
Reply

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Reply

Yes, yes I do. I'd rather raise my child, our child, than go to work tooooo... what... hmm what is that now... oh I remember! PAY for someone ELSE unrelated to my family whatsoever to raise my child for me. No thanks.

Reply

Considering full time daycare where I come from is about $1,100 a month. That's my take home working 40 hour weeks. I see my child for a few hours a day to have no money left over? or be in the sane financial situation and see, feed, raise, teach and live with my son everyday. That's a toughy!

Reply

I just hope that you and your child are not a huge financial strain to your significant other one (in case you have them). Providing for two people, one of whom is extremely high-maintenance, is kinda....stressful.

Reply

Yeah women = time x money so we substitute here women = money x money and everyone knows money is the root of all evil therefore the root of all evil squared = money squared = women So we simplify this to come out with women=evil QED

Reply

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Loading data…