131
By snoozerlooser - / Saturday 25 December 2010 00:00 / Canada
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments

1 - "Nookie" refers to sex of any kind. No where did she state she hadn't given him any sex; she just hadn't had anal sex with him. To the others - Anal is DEFINITELY not necessary for marriage. If you're the type of guy who stands by that and believes it: a) don't get married. Ever. b) change your damn views, because they're wrong. and/or c) you probably won't get a girlfriend who'll stay, so you better start lookin' at dudes.

Comments

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Reply

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Reply

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Reply

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Reply

1 - "Nookie" refers to sex of any kind. No where did she state she hadn't given him any sex; she just hadn't had anal sex with him. To the others - Anal is DEFINITELY not necessary for marriage. If you're the type of guy who stands by that and believes it: a) don't get married. Ever. b) change your damn views, because they're wrong. and/or c) you probably won't get a girlfriend who'll stay, so you better start lookin' at dudes.

Reply

srsly, you shouldn't get married if you haven't even discussed anal yet. if you can't discuss basic sex positions, your relationship is pretty much screwed. (or not, lol)

Reply

Their views ARE wrong if they believe that anal sex is necessary in a marriage. It is not. Just because I argue that anal sex is not wrong doesn't mean I'm hypocritical. Please rethink your "logic"... something isn't working for you.

Reply

I am confident most people would agree it's not a requirement for a marriage. Happiness, communication and occasional space are among the things most deem important and necessary to a marriage.

Reply

I'm not trying to dictate. I'm trying to make the point that it's clearly not a necessity. If they're both mature people and she declines to partake in that, then the relationship shouldn't suffer. On the flip side, if he's not into giving oral sex the relationship shouldn't suffer if he declines to give it to her either, IMO. I understand that everyone has their differences and some things work better than others in terms of relationships. But as said, a relationship's survival is not dependent

Reply

There's the difference. Sex in general is most often quite necessary. But, obviously there are many different styles, positions and types... so it's not as clear cut as you're trying to make it. Anal sex and other common key components of a good relationship do not compare, so you can't (and the guy I originally responded to) can't try to compare them. What is a relationship without its foundations (love, respect, trust, communication, time apart - for some, if not most people, and happiness?

Reply

:l Once again you're missing my point. I clearly said in post 102 that I did in fact understand that people may have different needs, and I'm not simply looking at my own and calling it black. I'm telling you that MOST PEOPLE AGREE what I mentioned (among a few other things, I'm sure) that those are the most important and most necessary. You're arguing for nothing and not reading what's in front of your face. Good god.

Reply

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Reply

In my view, they are wrong and I'm sick and tired of you trying to be this macho asshole over the internet. I made my point. If you don't like it, that's cool. Ignore it and don't post on my comments. You know that every time you do, it will turn into a long thread of arguments. It's happened every time so far. I'm done wasting my time on this thread and I hope you realize I stand behind my point and no matter how many times you try to bust it with your sometimes insane thinking, it's not goi

Reply

Fairly tame? You challenge every little thing whether you're actually right or not. Half the time, if not more, I am right yet you still argue. You usually keep going until you've exhausted us both... Yes, I do think you're being "macho" for lack of a better phrase. You're trying to make it seem like you're all that. It's very clear. We BOTH need to stop responding and commenting on each other's stuff. I'm not the only one at fault in terms of that, here. I'm sure you can also see t

Reply

I'm not completely wrong, hence your demonstration with the last post. Pathetic is the perfect word to describe you. Thank you for ending this discussion. Do not start another... I thought I'd throw that in there even though I know you'll start another argument. It's what you do, right?

Reply

Yeah, please guys don't start another. Reading this one made me feel like my brain was being sandpapered into a very fine, carcinogenic mist.

Reply

what the hell... that was a pretty intense arguement, normally I'd see this kind of intensity in the topics of politics, religion, and so on. but what is the topic? doing it in the butt... FML and everyone elses who read the whole comment thread

Reply

I hate when OP's lead us on like that. I am all atwitter with excitement. Did he get permission to travel the Hershey Highway?

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Reply

I don't think she deserved it. She heard the statement out of context, and when hearing "pop the question" marriage is the first thing that comes to a persons mind.

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Reply

"Betta"? " if "YA" ask me" Why do so many girls think they"ll turn a guy on if they replace last letters in some words with "A"

Reply

Why do you think guys think they will turn a girl on with replacing a letter with A? It's called shortening a word for convenience of time, it has nothing to do with turning someone on.

Loading data…