185
By omfgitburns - / Thursday 6 January 2011 14:54 /
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
Comments
Reply

Wow that's very strange. The cast cutter only vibrates. There should be no way for it to cause damage to skin. Only thing I can think of is you had issues with your skin while the cast was on and the saw made it worse. Sorry it happened to you.

Reply

You should sue for malpractice!

Reply
  pinglol  |  5

That's exactly what the doctor who sliced my brother's arm open told him. Doc: "It only vibrates I can't be cutting you!" Brother: "WHY DOES IT HURT SO MUCH?!?!" then the cast comes off and blood is everywhere. He still has the scar.

Reply
  VraelVhalen  |  0

You guys have got to be making that shit up. They wrap your arm in cotton before they put your cast on, so even if it spins it won't even touch you skin. Before you make shit up check your facts (I would know, I have had more than 3 casts in the last 2 years)

Reply
  ReDsKiNsMaN  |  0

you proble did something to it before it was cut off cause that's never happend to me or anyone I know

Reply
  inssanity  |  0

Ok, I've never had a cast myself, but I do know a bunch of people who have. I'm trying to picture in my mind how you think cotton will stop a saw that is cutting through plaster... I don't really care how or where the cotton is put on, but I really don't think that a little fluff will do the trick.

Reply
  Iskaria  |  0

Ok going to post this here in the hopes that people read it before going all misinformed troll rage down yonder. The way the saw works, any damage would be grazing and friction burns. It wouldn't properly slice you open. It's not an uncommon occurrence, if you have a more 'solid' arm at the point the cut is being made it can start to graze there, also with excessive pressure or a faulty/old/worn saw. If you think of the number of people world wide who have casts removed, then the potential for fault, both human and mechanical, logically of course it can happen, and does. Now who's the idiot? (Directed at the flock of mentally deficient naysayers calling OP an idiot/liar)

Reply
  untoward  |  0

Thx 120 for not reading the previous posts. I don't know what the saw looks like or how it works, but I'm smart enough to realize that nothing is 100%. By that I mean: whenever someone says "all" or "never" there is usually an exception to the rule. Also, its not like OP said that the body part was 'sliced open'. There were burns and blisters. Indicating to me repeated contact in one area.

Reply
  monnanon  |  13

or the burns and blisters could be an allergic reaction to the plaster or cotton, a slow acting one yes but its still possible. TBH i didn't think the saw could cut skin either but i suppose you never know.

Reply
  elnorris14  |  19

happened to me too and the guy taking my cast off said impossible. well when he took it off there was New blood on my scar and a new two inch cut above the scar from my surgery. so to all the nay-sayers trying to tell us we are wrong.....shut up, you are the ones that are wrong.

Reply
  madeline9322  |  17

Your pretty stupid. I'm sure they just slipped some fake blood and blisters under their cast the night before. How stupid are you to get that many casts by the way?

Reply
  duma191  |  19

I cut my own cast off with a rotary buzz saw. it's cheaper and you can keep from getting cut. I do not condone this to anyone without a steady hand or basic first aid training.

Reply
  mnwv  |  3

Get use to it unless I'm on my computer my iPhone likes to correct shit that should be corrected, on my computer I will be pretty good with my grammar not on my iPhone. Sorry to disappoint

Reply

^ This. What a bitch nurse. I don't care if theoretically the saw can't touch skin, if the patient says they can feel it, you stop and figure some other way to get the cast off. (And a saw, seriously? Bloody hell am I glad I've never broken any bones.... 0.o Wow.)

Reply
  funktown  |  2

11. is suing the only reaction u fucking Americans have? Jesus.

Reply
  JManHobbs  |  0

11, guilty conscience?

Reply
  starile  |  19

I'm just tired of ignorant bigots making overgeneralizing blanket statements judging an entire nation every time someone mentions the word "sue". Of course I realize that my comment was egging some of these morons on, but I suppose there was some naive hope in me that people who should keep their mouths shut would keep their fucking mouths shut. But hey, it's FML! I know better than to have such expectations, WOOO!

Reply
  starile  |  19

I'm just tired of ignorant bigots making overgeneralizing blanket statements judging an entire nation every time someone mentions the word "sue". Of course I realize that my comment was egging some of these morons on, but I suppose there was some naive hope in me that people who should keep their mouths shut would keep their fucking mouths shut. But hey, it's FML! I know better than to have such expectations, WOOO!

Reply
  nathan5  |  0

Saying sue for something like that was just leaving it open for "lololollololol onli in amrica!!!!1!1!!1 rofll" to be a reply. Americans have a name for sueing, that kind of comment- aside from the high amount of lawsuits in America!- is probably why it has this name...of course its not the nurses fault, shes been told that it cannot harm you so shes right to assume that the OPs fears are paranoid. Somethime its just unfortunate-no ones fault!

Reply
  sparc_fml  |  4

#53 - ignorance is no excuse. They clearly CAN cause damage in some circumstances, even if those circumstances are rare - this is something the nurse SHOULD know if she is going to be performing the procedure, even if it's routine. An appendectomy is a very basic and 'easy' surgery. You don't see a surgeon saying 'Oh.. well I wasn't TOLD I couldn't remove your spleen when I took out your appendix, it's no ones fault!'. No. You expect that surgeon to be fully trained and know what they hell they are doing. The patient clearly told her that it was hurting and something was amiss. She responded with a false statement (that was HER responsibility to know, or her supervisors to ensure she knew), ignored the complaints and told the patient they were being paranoid. This caused the patient needless pain and scarring. Explain how this is not the nurses/hospitals fault? Sue them and set a pecident.. all of a sudden every nurse doing this procedure knows to explain the operation of the saw beforehand to let the patient know there should be zero pain (and thus reduce cases of people thinking they're being hurt). Sidenote: not American or a lawyer. I just feel people are responsible for their actions, hold the nurse responsible for hers.

Reply
  nathan5  |  0

64 i disagree. Everyone makes mistakes. When i got my cast off the nurse told me it couldnt possibly harm me, every nurse says that...we shouldnt sue for every little mistake everyone makes, we'd all be broke!! Maybe the system needs to be changed but sueing shouldnt be tge automatic response

Reply
  CANNIBALx  |  0

if the "mistake" causes physical harm, then the nurse should be reprimanded, especially when the OP was in a setting where they be getting HEALED not HURT.

Reply
  amayasoma  |  19

127 - a hospital is the last place to make mistakes. They are dealing with other people's lives. If a doctor refuses to stop when I their patient is telling them I'm in pain, better believe I will sue.

Reply
  that_band_nerd  |  22

73- the type of saw they use can't cut an arm off. The nurse even turns in on and puts it up against her skin to show that it won't cut you. If you read the comment chains for the comments above this one they explain it in greater detail.

By  rattusrattus  |  18

Bleeding, I can understand, burns due to heat-build up from the saw too... but blisters? It takes a while for burns to blister and they have to be exposed to air. Still. Ouch.

By  cantthink123  |  11

The same thing almost happened to me, but the nurse that was removing my cast wasn't such a dumba**. Once I told her that it felt like it was touching my skin, she got this plastic thing and slid it under my cast so that the saw touched the thick plastic, and not my skin.

By  ulicksam  |  0

Those are skin legions - dry, flaky, cracked, even bleeding - which is normal for skin that's been covered for weeks or months. They are not burns or cuts. You're all idiots.

Reply
  theRovingMage  |  0

THIS! If a saw really was touching your skin, you'd see lacerations and they'd send you home with stitches. Burns and blisters do not come from a saw cutting skin, thanks.

Reply
  DocBastard  |  38

I disagree with you on the basis of your misspelling of "lesions". Otherwise, you're exactly right. That plaster saw doesn't cut skin, nor does it burn. Blisters take time to develop. So everyone screaming "sue!" needs to get a clue. Edit: beaten by Sallen. Drat. Edit 2: My rhyme was unintentionally awesome.

Reply
  missrubyruby  |  0

so how come I have this epic scar running down my hand where the saw was and I was screaming telling them to stop? it's so possible. consider yourself lucky if it didn't happen to you. a holes.

Loading data…