By Anonymous - / Saturday 18 May 2013 19:27 / Mexico - Celaya
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
  Welshite  |  39

#13: It's sexism both ways, and there is no need to be bitter. I'd like to think we've grown out of such traditional ideals, but you managed to bring it up anyway.

  mmizbbz210  |  13

although this situation is different and he was most likely making a statement like that out of laziness, my fiance and I share whatever money we get because couple's who are commited like that should look at it as"their" money not individually.

  EvilUndead  |  9

23, That depends on the couple. If, say, one of them can't control how much he/she spends, it'll be better if other person controls finances and hands out the allowance.

  yahoowizard  |  16

Like it would be sexist if that father was working and the mother wasn't, and you'd tell the mother that she'd better be working in the kitchen and doing the laundry.

  yahoowizard  |  16

Plus there are those families where the father might not be making enough or may have lost his job so the mother gets a job as well to support the family. However if the father gets the necessary raise or his job back it would be okay for the mother to quit hers.

By  cmayer  |  20

Maybe he's mad bc you're getting promotions and he doesn't have a job. His pride is probably hurt. He's still being a baby though.

By  HortonThelephant  |  15

Surely with such a distinguished position in the company you can put in a good reference for him!

  loveingit  |  7

Post said husband the money would be joint not the owner of who "worked" for it. But if that was not the law how would it work? You eat dinner but hubby gets no food as you cut him off?

Loading data…