By Anonymous - / Sunday 9 January 2011 01:11 / United States
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
  DudeImBetter  |  0

That is some complete b s that you have to put your cat down, I'm actually pissed off cause of that. I have to agree, this is the best. I can't think of anything else that would be worse than this fml.

  FAILml  |  7

the cat just wanted some action with mans balls...

  FAILml  |  7

all the cat wanted was some action... but the man was hogging the wife so he sliced his balls open. firetruck.

  dre_bro11  |  12

122; OP shouldn't need to pay for the 'surgery' anyway. If OP is married, then his cat is also his wife's cat, meaning his wife should either have to pay or at least pay half. And the shit about putting the cat down... give it to a relative until you sort your stuff out and just say you did put it down.

  Sydknee  |  8

awww.. I don't see why you have to put down your cat, he didn't even kill the person, and yet when a person kills a person we don't always kill the killler.

  RawrBunneh  |  0


  Ashley121645  |  0

best cat ever! Dont kill it take it somewhere and say u shot it a threw it in a river so they cant ask for the body. then put down ur wife or at least divorce that freaking whore and dont pay shit for his balls. make her pay it she owns the cat too legally if ur married, and it happened under her supervision. Her fault. And get rid of your friend.

  zaadam2  |  5

#1 - Awesomeeee cat

#2 - I really, really, really doubt a cat could damage balls that bad. But then again, I've never experienced my balls being attacked like that :P.

#3 - I don't see how you would really be liable for his medical records. I could see why given the sad state of affairs with the misuse of the courts why you might have to but you'd have an EXCELLENT chance in court of not having to pay for anything if you wanted.

  sloaan  |  0

Perhaps the cat was seeking vengeance, for his own possible neuter! If so, his balls were cut open with a scalpel blade before being removed, so he just wanted revenge on the nearest pair to take out his anger and tainted manhood.

Just a guess though.


Why wouldn't he have a choice? I imagine the cat was doing what any normal animal would in its situation and defending its territory by attacking the strange thing that had come in to it.

  nature_girl_08  |  10

141: he may not have a choice because many states require that any animal that attacks a person must be put down. it's to avoid further incidents. personally, i think it's a completely idiotic law. if a dog/cat bites or scratches a stranger who has provoked them, that's a natural reaction. people react the same exact way. well, we don't bite, but we do punch or shove on reflex when something startles us, threatens us, etc.

  Tysonator  |  0

I agree with 310. The cat was the hero of the situation!! And now it will die as a result of doing the right thing. How unjust.
Also, what 310 said reminds me of BuckBeak in HP3

  venomlash  |  9

Here in Illinois, I believe there is still a law concerning alienation of affection. Dunno about Texas.

Don't kill your cat, bro, and certainly don't pay for your "friend's" surgery. If he wants to make a big deal about it, let him. He can make it a big neighborhood scandal, and everyone will think he's a tosser, a real prick, and will laud your cat for his loyalty. Especially if your "friend" is married; won't his missus love to hear that story circulating!

By  nikki_4eva  |  0

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

  PurplePeeps  |  0

Please tell me that the quotes were used to refer to the idiocity of some other person, and that's not really how you believe 'accidentally' is spelt. Hell, who am I kidding? I ask too for too much.

Loading data…