105
By Champignon - / Friday 1 November 2013 14:17 / Belgium - Brasschaat
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
Comments
By  johnnyshred612  |  4

...well, Happy Halloween, I guess.

Reply
  DocBastard  |  38

Because it has nothing to do with Halloween whatsoever. When you get thumbed down, you have two choices: 1) accept it and move on, or 2) find all the people who thumbed you down and kill them. #2 can be tricky, so I'd advise you to go with #1.

Reply
  Jjimen1654  |  9

Yea 2 is right why take the labia which is attached and you have to wait for it to grow to take off extra. Any smart person would use the already readily available foreskin taken from circumcisions.

Reply
  Enslaved  |  36

You never know. If I was a burn victim or war veteran-- missing my ears, I would like the option to decide if I would be willing to have that procedure done. There are a great number of women that are having labiaplasty surgeries. I guess due to a rise in porn, some women feel they need to have that pornstar look in order to feel sexy. I think those are the women that would supply the "lobes". Waste not want not. :P

Reply
  perdix  |  29

#3, wouldn't you like the feeling of permanently streaking? I guess that was a short-lived fad in the 70's, but Ray Stevens immortalized the craft.

Reply
  SaturnV  |  25

"Waste not want not" indeed, but unfortunately, the scenario of labiaplasty patients as skin graft donors might not be entirely practical (assuming the mom's idea would even work). Allogenic (meaning the donor is another person) skin grafts usually trigger an immune response from the host, thus making them highly susceptible to rejection. An autograft (skin taken from a healthy site on the patient's own body) would be a better long-term solution, but does not allow the patient to retain her intact labia AND have grafted ear lobes.

By  ViviMage  |  33

Hairy earlobes?! No thanks.

Loading data…