75
By TitMunch / Sunday 23 October 2011 23:58 / United States
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
Comments
Reply
  MrBoredGuy  |  1

What enonymous meant to say was that he wants to run a train on the bride and her daughter. He then realized that OP was a minor and quickly edited his comment to something that a 3 year old could of came up with... Right enon?

Reply
  LiyIa_fml  |  8

Clutz's ftw! (I most likely spelled that wrong, but I don't care. Fuck you grammar nazi's.)

By  mofran  |  0

?_? . damn.

By  palahniukpaul  |  6

Happened to me once...

By  EarAcheMyEYE10  |  2

Ouch... well it could have been worse... you could of projectile vomited on her... or passed out and fell on her... or you could of been called out for doing her new husband... now those reeeeeaaaaly suck.... so don't sweat it!!!

Reply
  RedPillSucks  |  30

Because it makes things easier to read and understand, and it's not that hard to do. Interestingly, "could have" is used correctly the first time, then "could of" is used in the 2nd and 3rd instance. This may be a short attention span thing.

Reply
  bamagrl410  |  31

Well unfortunately most people these days don't understand that trashy pop culture shows get their references from other shows that actually managed to keep an audience without having to make sexual references or fart jokes all the time...

Loading data…