306
By ihateteenagers - / Thursday 30 December 2011 02:12 / United States
Add a comment
You must be logged in to be able to post comments!
Create my account Sign in
Top comments
Comments
Reply
  bernzz  |  0

violence is not the answer unless it has to do with punching punks who make fun of the mentally handicapped people, then yes violence is the answer.

Reply
  Jizwold  |  0

I punched one of my friends in the face and broke his nose and gave him a concussion... I didn't go to jail though and I had way less of a reason to do it. sorry op

By  omgshaylaaa  |  0

well duh op. you can't expect to get away with acts of violence even though the punk deserved it.

Reply
  5HAD0W  |  4

Obviously not. The child is not physically hurt in any way.

Reply
  Emrysa  |  1

Yeah op, don't you know it's survival of the spineless now? You can steal, mentally and physically torture those who can't fight back, and the law will protect you as long as no one in authority sees or feels like doing anything about it, and you can even sue if someone tries to stop you. Jeeze get with the program.

Reply
  Lehk  |  8

#41, actially OP was held accountable for being a violent criminal. if you are going to try to use "big" words like "vigilante" learn to spell them first, then learn their meaning. an escalating vengeful act is not vigilantism, if it had been someone else's retarded kid OP was looking out for then it could be vigilantism.

Reply
  justbecuz123  |  0

@94 - Yeah, here in America it is too. But we seem to follow "oh, well, um we didn't see anything, so to be fair we can't prove anything that would merit punishment. It looks like this man just ran out of nowhere and punched a kid in the face while he was talking to another kid." Fucking... this country, piece of shit... I tell ya, not that I wish I lived anywhere else, because I wouldnt know where would be better, but I still cant stand living in America.

Reply
  RatTatTat  |  0

*actually. and 41's point was the punk college kid was clearly in the wrong, yet nothing happened to him. but the parent who was just standing up for their kid and his mental well-being gets arrested. also, "vigilant" is the word 41 meant.

Reply
  Mr_Serious  |  6

how about you learn to use context clues like the school system taught us in 3rd grade, if not earlier, because vigilant is the proper word to use in that sentence. Dipshit, go flame on elsewhere where people can't actually use the language that they speak.

By  chorzo  |  0

Too many negative votes, comment buried. Show the comment

Reply
  hairt  |  4

I found it funny ;(

Reply
  GiggidyPants  |  0

hey OP is not a retard. we prefer to be called little people

Reply
  ncvolley123  |  8

what the hell is your problem? You are a terrible persone, and deserve to be shot in the nads with a BB gun. I hope it goes deep into your testicles, you bastard,

Reply
  mecolaya  |  0

It's funny because people's automatic reaction to retard jokes is, apparently, to shoot the offender in the nuts. I had no idea. Oh, and blue guy's a dumbass. He should be nut-shot.

Reply
  arkumx  |  3

z is right next to x. a typo is not a misspelling. don't harsh on someone for missing a key. correct people spell weird like wierd or something like that.

Loading data…